Paper Tigers, Hidden Dragons: Firms and the Political Economy of China’s Technological Development

  • Doug Fuller on The Political Economy Of China's Technological Development
  • Doug Fuller Discusses His Book "Paper Tigers, Hidden Dragons"
  • Q&A Session Following the Screening of "The Revolutionary"
  • Young Money - Senile ft. Tyga, Nicki Minaj, Lil Wayne
  • China and a Global Green System of Innovation by Professor Dora Marinova
  • 纪录片《死于中国之手:美国是如何失去其制造业基础的》(英文字幕)
  • James Casbolt - MI6 Buried Alive (Full Book)
  • Maloof Symposium: Furniture and the Future - Session 2
  • Andrew Belle (Schubas 102410) - Smiths Cover - Please, Please, Please, Let Me Get What I Want
  • A Day In the Sky,.. - ( news full video )
«
»
Amazon Price: $95.00 (as of October 20, 2017 6:53 am - Details). Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on the Amazon site at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

China presents us with a conundrum. How has a developing country with a spectacularly inefficient financial system, coupled with asset-destroying state-owned firms, managed to create a number of vibrant high-tech firms?

China's domestic financial system fails most private firms by neglecting to give them sufficient support to pursue technological upgrading, even while smothering state-favoured firms by providing them with too much support. Due to their foreign financing, multinational corporation's suffer from neither insufficient funds nor soft budget constraints, but they are insufficiently committed to China's development. Hybrid firms that combine ethnic Chinese management and foreign financing are the hidden dragons driving China's technological development. They avoid the maladies of China's domestic financial system while remaining committed to enhancing China's domestic technological capabilities.

In sad contrast, China's domestic firms are technological paper tigers. State efforts to build local innovation clusters and create national champions have not managed to transform these firms into drivers of technological development.

These findings upend fundamental debates about China's political economy. Rather than a choice between state capitalism and building domestic market institutions, China has fostered state capitalism even while tolerating the importing of foreign market institutions. While the book's findings suggest that China's state and domestic market institutions are ineffective, the hybrids promise an alternative way to avoid the middle-income trap. By documenting how variation in China's institutional terrain impacts technological development, the book also provides much needed nuance to widespread yet mutually irreconcilable claims that China is either an emerging innovation power or a technological backwater.

Looking beyond China, hybrid-led development has implications for new alternative economic development models and new ways to conceptualize contemporary capitalism that go beyond current domestic institution-centric approaches.